WHAT IS IT THAT MAKES THIS BEAUTIFUL GAME OF BRIDGE SO UNAPPEALING ?............... ( Dr. Sigmund T. Schukelgruber's poem offers one possible answer )
I go to my club
And who do I see
Off putting players
As mean as can be
Those who sneer
Those who peer
Those who moan
Those who groan
The big-headed
The pig-headed
The reckless
The feckless
Those who bleat
Those who cheat
Those who lurk
Those who smirk
The officious
The malicious
The moody
The broody
Those who ponder
Those who squander
Those who brag
Those who nag
The elitist
The defeatist
The humpy
The grumpy
Such a great shame
They spoil this game
A 'Must Read' blog for all motorists currently being shafted by morally bankrupt private car parking companies as well as aspiring players and addicts of the game Bridge.
Monday, 13 February 2017
Wednesday, 8 February 2017
BRIDGE BOOKS WHICH PUN RECKONS ARE ABSOLUTE CRACKERS...........
- If He Makes This Slam The Match Is Lost.........................O. P. Fayles
- That Gift Of A Top Handed Us The Trophy.........................Evan Scent
- Yes I Admit That Every Seat I Vacate Is Always Wet..........I. P. Hallot
- I Can't Stand The Way He Looks At My Lady Partner........C. D. Auldman
- Many Bridge Players Cheat To A Lesser Extent..................Eve N. Mee
- That Was The Only Decent Thing Our Ex-chairman Did....Stan Downe
- We Need To Rid This Club Of Cheats Permanantly............Ann Mia Gunn
- He's Always Peeking At The Opponents' Cards................. B. D. Hyde
- You Need To Shout Out Loud To Call Over A Director .......Jess Holler
- If He Claims To Have Won Trophies Then He's Lying.........Fuller Bluster
- There's Something He Likes Doing More Than Bridge.......Roger Ringbuoys
- Anyone Guilty Of Cheating Deserves A Good Whipping.... A. T. Lashes
Thursday, 5 January 2017
THE 10 WORST CRIMES YOU CAN COMMIT AT THE BRIDGE TABLE.......( in rank bad order of heinous and outrageous behaviour )
- Murder
- Plonking a bridgemate down underneath an opponent's nose
- Assaulting an opponent
- Setting fire to or ripping up your scorecard
- Smirking with glee at an opponent's mistake
- Vacating your seat in a very damp state
- Cheating of any kind in any form
- Farting with gay abandon
- Shouting obscenities at your hapless partner
- Picking one's nose or sneezing out loudly
Monday, 12 December 2016
THE ULTIMATE CLUB SECRETARY : THE JOB SPECIFICATION
The ideal candidate needs to possess the following abilities , attributes and skills if wishing to become an effective bridge club secretary :
1. Thick skinned and pig-headed
2. Incapable of apologising or showing remorse
3. A fantasist
4. A master of brevity and spin
5. An expert in the art of giving out misinformation . disinformation and meaningless cliches
6. Manipulative and controlling
7. Full of guile and cunning
8. Dogged and determined , never prepared to let things go , forgive or forget, bury the
hatchet, forget the past and acknowledge compromise as a sensible solution
9. Power crazy
10. Fully committed to converting personal agendas into committee ones
11. Passionate about promoting despotism and nepotism within the officer ranks of the
committee
12. A natural and egoistic hypocrite forever doing what she/he tells others they can't
The ideal candidate needs to possess the following abilities , attributes and skills if wishing to become an effective bridge club secretary :
1. Thick skinned and pig-headed
2. Incapable of apologising or showing remorse
3. A fantasist
4. A master of brevity and spin
5. An expert in the art of giving out misinformation . disinformation and meaningless cliches
6. Manipulative and controlling
7. Full of guile and cunning
8. Dogged and determined , never prepared to let things go , forgive or forget, bury the
hatchet, forget the past and acknowledge compromise as a sensible solution
9. Power crazy
10. Fully committed to converting personal agendas into committee ones
11. Passionate about promoting despotism and nepotism within the officer ranks of the
committee
12. A natural and egoistic hypocrite forever doing what she/he tells others they can't
Thursday, 1 December 2016
A LOOK INTO THE FUTURE WHERE BRIDGE CLUBS ARE DYING BY THE THOUSANDS........ ( As depicted in a poem adapted from a Leonard Cohen classic )
The chairman called me over
She fumbled for my hand
" I want you to take my office
I'm giving you command "
" Command of what, there's no one left
There's only you and me
All the members are dead and gone
On that we can agree "
" Complain , complain ...that's all you've done
Ever since that awful cost
Of hefty sums on legal fees
For a case I'm afraid we lost "
" May Christ have mercy on you soul
Your actions were a sickening joke
This wretched episode destroyed our club
As valuable funds went up in smoke "
" I know that you have suffered more
But consider this for a while
Whatever makes an opponent sad
Always makes a declarer smile "
" Sorry but I'm leaving now
You need to surely understand
So get this into your tiny head
There's no point in making a stand
There's no hope in members returning
They've all gone to pastures new
Everyone is into internet bridge
Where robots players are fair and true
My commitment to this club is done
You'll rally me no more
I don't even know what I'm doing here
What the club is really for
I've spent far too long aboard this boat
Which has been leaking money fast
We are now in deep dark trouble
The die has been surely cast
I've read the recent AGM report
And most of it is grim if not black
There's no hope for any salvation
There's no chance of going back "
Now the chairman she was pleading
But I steadfastly refused the poisoned chalice
Why on earth would I take command
When my heart was racked with malice
The chairman called me over
She fumbled for my hand
" I want you to take my office
I'm giving you command "
" Command of what, there's no one left
There's only you and me
All the members are dead and gone
On that we can agree "
" Complain , complain ...that's all you've done
Ever since that awful cost
Of hefty sums on legal fees
For a case I'm afraid we lost "
" May Christ have mercy on you soul
Your actions were a sickening joke
This wretched episode destroyed our club
As valuable funds went up in smoke "
" I know that you have suffered more
But consider this for a while
Whatever makes an opponent sad
Always makes a declarer smile "
" Sorry but I'm leaving now
You need to surely understand
So get this into your tiny head
There's no point in making a stand
There's no hope in members returning
They've all gone to pastures new
Everyone is into internet bridge
Where robots players are fair and true
My commitment to this club is done
You'll rally me no more
I don't even know what I'm doing here
What the club is really for
I've spent far too long aboard this boat
Which has been leaking money fast
We are now in deep dark trouble
The die has been surely cast
I've read the recent AGM report
And most of it is grim if not black
There's no hope for any salvation
There's no chance of going back "
Now the chairman she was pleading
But I steadfastly refused the poisoned chalice
Why on earth would I take command
When my heart was racked with malice
Wednesday, 23 November 2016
BENIGN BRIDGE CLUB ( USA ) : COMMITTEE IMPOSES NEW RULES IN KEEPING WITH THE STRICT ZERO TOLERANCE REGIME
- The Committee is always right
- The Committee is never wrong
- Even if the Committee is wrong no one is allowed to comment on the fact
- Dissident members are to be classed as the scum of the earth
- Anyone who is regarded as a dissident member who will hounded out of the club
- Disciplinary hearings will always be conducted behind closed doors using all the bias and prejudice needed to get the bastards expelled
- No one must ever mention the vast sums of money the Committee has wasted on obscene and financially crippling legal fees
- The Committee believes very strongly in giving members both disinformation and misinformation in order to maintain harmony and contentment within the ranks
- Elephants do not occupy Committee rooms despite the fact that huge piles of dung have been used as manure on the garden beds
- Approved committee members expect to be voted in unopposed at the next AGM
- Any club member who does not vote properly will be taken to the cellars and starved to death
- All members will be obliged to swear on the Holy Bible that grovelling compliance , obedience and loyalty are their primary duties
- Every member is required to snitch on any other member who appears to be harbouring negative thoughts , attitudes and concerns about the never-ending shenanigans the Committee constantly get up to
- For zero tolerance to work the Committee must be given a free reign to do as it pleases in a climate where forgiveness of human error is not an option
- The days of asking errant members to sit on the naughty chairs are well and truly over , as the wood from these chairs will be used to build a state-of-the-art scaffold
Tuesday, 15 November 2016
BRIDGE BOOKS SOME LADIES MIGHT FIND OFFENSIVE......
- Whoever Farted At This Table Needs To Own Up Right Now.............Otis Mee
- Club Chairman's Wasteful Expenditure Makes Front Page News......Ed Liner
- Quite Frankly I Would Like To Shoot All Those On Committee...........Mo M. Downe
- Why Do Lady Members Turn Up With Colour In Their Hair.................Fanny Green
- He's Threatening To Sue The Club For Wrongful expulsion................E. L. Knott-Duett
- I Need To Be Updated On The Latest Bridge Gossip............ ..............Phil Mehan
- Madam Trust Me To Find You The Perfect Bridge Partner...................Dizzy Shagwell
- It's Easy To Spot Those Who Enforce Zero Tolerance Rules..............Jack Boots
- My Partner's Game Is Hopeless Now He's Turned To Drink................B. R. Waller
- My Partner Seems To Have So Much Energy And Go........................Dinah Moe
- That Man Loves To Partner Juniors Who Are Still At School...............Roger Ringbuoys
- Winning Is Great When You Receive So Many Accolades..................Pat Sonya Backe
- I Can Never Get A Good Result Against This Cheating Dog............ Beau Geyman
- I Would Love To Play Bridge Around The Clock If Possible..................Diane Knight
Wednesday, 2 November 2016
BRIDGE : THE PERFECT IMPERFECT GAME....... ( Article by Carp )
Bridge is without doubt a most majestic and beautiful game. The irony of course is every one of its major imperfections plays an important part in making the game so perfect. These imperfections simply add to the enthralling challenge which faces each player at the table.
Some commentators have defined bridge as a two-person zero sum game in that it involves two players forming a partnership. Therefore it becomes immediately apparent that each player has to overcome imperfect recall. One or both will forget things they knew or have experienced in the past. Establishing a perfect wave-length and understanding with partner inevitably takes years of hard work and practice , an objective which unfortunately is never likely to come to fruition.
In some extreme cases a player might fail to recall what is on their convention card , what took place in the auction, what cards have been played during a hand , and what happened in near identical hands they encountered before. The absence of a perfect memory creates an imperfect recall, which becomes a difficult obstacle to overcome.
Another imperfection lies in the fact that during the early play of the hand so many cards remain hidden from view. With this degree of imperfect knowledge of who holds what , difficult decisions and choices have to be made. The challenge here to replace guesswork with logical deduction , clue analysis and sound judgement. Assumptions need to be drawn on all the evidence gathered to date, combined with an imperfect knowledge of the true statistical odds that apply at any given stage of the hand in play. Based on imperfect analysis at the start of play , players strive valiantly to identify the best lines of play , especially when more and more information comes to light.
The reality of the game is that the number of possible bidding sequences in an auction, along with the possible sequences of cards being played , run into tens of thousands. This means that in a very large field various different contracts will be arrived at , and that the outcomes in an identical contract will vary enormously. An imperfect opening lead, continuation or switch is often the root cause of such diverse outcomes.
Players are required to make imperfect choices based on imperfect information. This imperfection might well be (a) the lack of any information at all or (b) misleading information , and (c) inadequate information leading to false assumptions and mistakes. The fact that any player at the table can be guilty of off-centre bids , psychs , and deceptive gambits , not to mention stupidity, the idea that perfect information could exist is an absolute non-starter.
However , the main reason why bridge is such an imperfect game is , I'm afraid , down to the fact that too many players cheat. Some of cheating is unintentional , petty and soft. Other forms of cheating have become hard , deliberate , calculating , intentional and highly sophisticated ( possibly undetectable ). The challenge here for the good honest players is to recognise its presence and to report their findings to the governing bodies , The problem here is that whatever suspicions and accusations are made , they must be supported by strong irrefutable evidence.
Finally , we come to the imperfections of each and every player , who will always fall the victim to The Human Condition. The majority of players are prone to lapses of memory , focus , concentration, discipline and ethical conduct. Directors are prone to an imperfect knowledge or interpretation of the rules , allowing prejudice and bias to determine their decisions. Noise and disturbances at other tables create an imperfect environment in which players struggle to maintain focus and concentration.
So yes , bridge becomes the perfect game in that players have to overcome all the imperfections inherent in the game. These added challenges are immense , but the beauty and majesty of the game makes each and every one worth taking on.
Bridge is without doubt a most majestic and beautiful game. The irony of course is every one of its major imperfections plays an important part in making the game so perfect. These imperfections simply add to the enthralling challenge which faces each player at the table.
Some commentators have defined bridge as a two-person zero sum game in that it involves two players forming a partnership. Therefore it becomes immediately apparent that each player has to overcome imperfect recall. One or both will forget things they knew or have experienced in the past. Establishing a perfect wave-length and understanding with partner inevitably takes years of hard work and practice , an objective which unfortunately is never likely to come to fruition.
In some extreme cases a player might fail to recall what is on their convention card , what took place in the auction, what cards have been played during a hand , and what happened in near identical hands they encountered before. The absence of a perfect memory creates an imperfect recall, which becomes a difficult obstacle to overcome.
Another imperfection lies in the fact that during the early play of the hand so many cards remain hidden from view. With this degree of imperfect knowledge of who holds what , difficult decisions and choices have to be made. The challenge here to replace guesswork with logical deduction , clue analysis and sound judgement. Assumptions need to be drawn on all the evidence gathered to date, combined with an imperfect knowledge of the true statistical odds that apply at any given stage of the hand in play. Based on imperfect analysis at the start of play , players strive valiantly to identify the best lines of play , especially when more and more information comes to light.
The reality of the game is that the number of possible bidding sequences in an auction, along with the possible sequences of cards being played , run into tens of thousands. This means that in a very large field various different contracts will be arrived at , and that the outcomes in an identical contract will vary enormously. An imperfect opening lead, continuation or switch is often the root cause of such diverse outcomes.
Players are required to make imperfect choices based on imperfect information. This imperfection might well be (a) the lack of any information at all or (b) misleading information , and (c) inadequate information leading to false assumptions and mistakes. The fact that any player at the table can be guilty of off-centre bids , psychs , and deceptive gambits , not to mention stupidity, the idea that perfect information could exist is an absolute non-starter.
However , the main reason why bridge is such an imperfect game is , I'm afraid , down to the fact that too many players cheat. Some of cheating is unintentional , petty and soft. Other forms of cheating have become hard , deliberate , calculating , intentional and highly sophisticated ( possibly undetectable ). The challenge here for the good honest players is to recognise its presence and to report their findings to the governing bodies , The problem here is that whatever suspicions and accusations are made , they must be supported by strong irrefutable evidence.
Finally , we come to the imperfections of each and every player , who will always fall the victim to The Human Condition. The majority of players are prone to lapses of memory , focus , concentration, discipline and ethical conduct. Directors are prone to an imperfect knowledge or interpretation of the rules , allowing prejudice and bias to determine their decisions. Noise and disturbances at other tables create an imperfect environment in which players struggle to maintain focus and concentration.
So yes , bridge becomes the perfect game in that players have to overcome all the imperfections inherent in the game. These added challenges are immense , but the beauty and majesty of the game makes each and every one worth taking on.
Friday, 28 October 2016
THE DEVIL'S DICTIONARY .............
Trump :
(a) someone who talks out of his arse spewing hot air and offensive bile , an
obnoxious megalomaniac renown for possessing all the vile characteristics of
an arrogant, racist, sexist male chauvinist
(b) an american politician being one who clearly lives up to his name ( see above )
(c) a loud blast
(d) a card from the declared master suit which can beat any other card from the other suits
(e) a form of deceptive foolery often used by bridge players keen to persuade opponents
into making false assumptions
(f) a false allegation which an unscrupulous member will concoct and put forward to a
committee, in a bold attempt to get someone he/she dislikes thrown out of the club
(g) the name given to the loud stomping sound the elephant makes in the committee
room in a vain attempt to be seen
(h) a bodily function which bridge players should refrain from doing during play , for fear
of embarrassment and/or severe reprimand from over zealous , zero tolerance
enforcement officers
Trump :
(a) someone who talks out of his arse spewing hot air and offensive bile , an
obnoxious megalomaniac renown for possessing all the vile characteristics of
an arrogant, racist, sexist male chauvinist
(b) an american politician being one who clearly lives up to his name ( see above )
(c) a loud blast
(d) a card from the declared master suit which can beat any other card from the other suits
(e) a form of deceptive foolery often used by bridge players keen to persuade opponents
into making false assumptions
(f) a false allegation which an unscrupulous member will concoct and put forward to a
committee, in a bold attempt to get someone he/she dislikes thrown out of the club
(g) the name given to the loud stomping sound the elephant makes in the committee
room in a vain attempt to be seen
(h) a bodily function which bridge players should refrain from doing during play , for fear
of embarrassment and/or severe reprimand from over zealous , zero tolerance
enforcement officers
Monday, 24 October 2016
THE DEVIL'S DICTIONARY........
- Pre-emptive raise : getting excited even before catching sight of an attractive lady opponent heading your way
- Danger hand : the one that your irate partner delivers from behind to smack your woolly thick head into gear
- Losing trick count : a negative and pessimistic approach to assessing the trick potential of your hand
- Top of nothing : coming first in a field full of novices and clueless rabbits
- Direction : the flight path chosen by the pilot of a flying bridgemate
- Responsive double : a large whisky consumed during the interval which galvanises a player into staying alert and performing better
- Rectifying the count : being made to calculate the correct number of tricks your side has taken, having previously inflated the total
- Menace : the term given to a crazed, cavalier and maverick pilot of a flying bridgemate
- Balancing : having to earn countless brownie points from your wife in order to gain essential pass outs for evening and/or weekend bridge
- Top : what an overly demanding player will blow when his/her partner cocks up a bog-standard defence
Sunday, 23 October 2016
THE DEVIL'S DICTIONARY REVISITED.......AGAIN
- Hesitations : the communication technique preferred by most cheating pairs
- 4th position : the one likely to be occupied at the end of the day by a team of rabbits in a field of four
- Agenda : a list drawn up by a committee naming all those undesirable members it intends to get rid of
- Misfits : the common term to describe partnerships where players operate on completely different wavelengths
- Good raise : what an easily excited player experiences when an attractive lady arrives at his table
- Trump echo : the phenomenon of a player's rather loud and smelly fart bouncing off a wall for a second attack on members' rather sensitive sense of smell
- Trial bid : when a club opts to take a dispute to court rather than seeking much more cost-effective options such as mediation and arbitration
- Rule of eleven : the number of cards a player should have left in his hand after the first two tricks have been taken
- Smother play : what any player would like to do to his inept partner if a cushion happens to be close at hand
- Switch : the action of an intolerant unforgiving player who quickly replaces one partner for another in his/her hopeless quest for flawless bridge
Sunday, 16 October 2016
CLASSIC BRIDGE BOOKS I FORGOT TO TELL YOU ABOUT.............. ( Says a sorry Pun )
- Partner We Need To Get Off To A Cracking Start....................Onya Marks
- 4S On An 11 Count And I Was Only One Trick Light...............Neil Lee Caymen
- Partner Why Aren't You Scoring For Our Side ?......................Owen Gole
- There's Only One Word To Describe How Bad We Were........Des Aster
- Partner Stop Throwing Me Off With Your Wild Antics..............Buck N. Broncoe
- So Sorry Everyone For Squandering All That Money..............Shay Moynue
- I Made A Grand Slam Missing 3 Outside Aces........................Candice B. Dunne
- I've Got One Helluva Surprise For You Partner !.....................Gus Watt
- This Has To Be The Best Squeeze Ever Made .......................Hugh B. Judge
- The Cheating That Goes On In This Game !............................Kent B. Levitt
- Talking Bridge Is Easy But Playing The Game Is Hard............Fuller Flannel
- Partner At least You Have One Great Attribute........................Dick Fitzwell
Wednesday, 12 October 2016
TWO SMART-ARSE BIDDERS ARE CONFRONTED BY A TOTALLY CONFUSED AND BEMUSED BIGOT.........
- So what do you call this ludicrous bidding system of yours ?
- The Foggy Unusual Club .......FUC for short
- Is it licensed ?
- Of course it is....the ACBL sanction anything these days.....not wishing to upset the top
rank players from devising specially complex and baffling systems to combat and retaliate
against the real smart-arses...... who were seeking to put one over them with theirs
- So tell me then.... what does your 1C opener say about the hand ?
- In a nutshell..... it can be anything ........ a weak or strong hand......but not necessarily
denying clubs
- And what about your responses ?
- All bids at the lower levels are completely artificial......and alertable......since the auction
will be a series of enquiry bids and stepping stone answer bids outlining short suits and
high card strength, the final contract can only be decided upon at the very end
- Oh....so how do you know what contract you need to be in having never bid your natural
suits and HCPs
- By a process of suit eliminations , logical deduction and intuitive reasoning
- That fine for you but how the hell do opponents like me ever get to work out your hands
- You're not meant to. Even if you asked questions about the alerts , the lengthy and highly
convoluted answers will either blow your mind , or put you off from ever asking again
- Well , I suppose I could look at your system card.... which thank God only appears to be
a 2-sided document
- You could..... but It wont do you much good unless you read and fully understand the 14
sides of supplementary notes that goes with it
- Christ almighty......this unusual system of yours leaves me in a complete fog
- That's its primary aim alright ......to fuc the opposition good and proper
- So what do you call this ludicrous bidding system of yours ?
- The Foggy Unusual Club .......FUC for short
- Is it licensed ?
- Of course it is....the ACBL sanction anything these days.....not wishing to upset the top
rank players from devising specially complex and baffling systems to combat and retaliate
against the real smart-arses...... who were seeking to put one over them with theirs
- So tell me then.... what does your 1C opener say about the hand ?
- In a nutshell..... it can be anything ........ a weak or strong hand......but not necessarily
denying clubs
- And what about your responses ?
- All bids at the lower levels are completely artificial......and alertable......since the auction
will be a series of enquiry bids and stepping stone answer bids outlining short suits and
high card strength, the final contract can only be decided upon at the very end
- Oh....so how do you know what contract you need to be in having never bid your natural
suits and HCPs
- By a process of suit eliminations , logical deduction and intuitive reasoning
- That fine for you but how the hell do opponents like me ever get to work out your hands
- You're not meant to. Even if you asked questions about the alerts , the lengthy and highly
convoluted answers will either blow your mind , or put you off from ever asking again
- Well , I suppose I could look at your system card.... which thank God only appears to be
a 2-sided document
- You could..... but It wont do you much good unless you read and fully understand the 14
sides of supplementary notes that goes with it
- Christ almighty......this unusual system of yours leaves me in a complete fog
- That's its primary aim alright ......to fuc the opposition good and proper
Friday, 7 October 2016
J'ACCUSE........J'ACCUSE ( Article by Professor Hu Chi Ku Chi )
The use of club funds for a costly and unnecessary legal defence does , in my view , warrants severe condemnation. Any club chairman who sets out to persuade the membership to back such a foolish course of action , rather than seek other far less costly options on offer , should now hang his/her head in shame.
If members knew or realised that outcomes of trials are unpredictable , and that money spent in mounting a vigorous and robust legal defence is never likely to be recovered , then such a course of action is pure insanity. What gambler would bet on an outcome where even if he backs a winner he wins nothing and loses his stake money.
Moreover , if the chairman had been asked to pay these exorbitant legal costs from his/her own pocket , then I'm more than certain another course of action would have been chosen , such as a quick resolution through mediation , or an offer to the plaintiff to drop the action in return for getting a proportion of the damages sought after.
Why the chairman and committee failed to undertake a cost benefit analysis of a long drawn out legal defense beggars belief. If one considers the opportunity costs involved in a club wasting over £130,000 in lawyers' fees , then one would surely end up being racked with guilt , shame and deep embarrassment : a new club house , new facilities , funds for marketing ( and promoting the game to encourage new members ) , sound a much more sensible use of such money. The secured long-term future of the club is, and always will be , of paramount importance.
Sometimes one has to choose the lesser of two evils : pay out a few thousand to a plaintiff who perhaps doesn't deserve a penny , or pay out tens of thousands to lawyers.... who then advise you to accept a hands-down offer to walk away from the dispute , indicating that the judge is far more likely to make each side pay their costs.
I once heard of a club spending an obscene amount of money on private investigators in an attempt to unearth and track down the author of a series of poison pen letters , when the sensible option was to simply ignore them. So why in God's name spend a six-figure sum on fighting a wrongful expulsion law suit , when a simple reinstatement or begrudging pay off was all that was required. When inmates have taken over the asylum , someone has to step up to the mark and allow common sense to prevail over raw emotions if fuelled by crass stubbornness , prejudice and pride.
Moral : if you are going to be wrong , do it after careful consideration.
Committee members should always be conscious of the conflict between their personal interests and those of the club. Moreover, they should continuously examine the proposed actions like embarking upon , and continuing with , a dogged and determined legal defence. Is such an action really meeting the club's core objectives ? These of course include (i) staying financially viable , (ii) investing funds for the future development of the game , (iii) up grading the club's facilities and (iv) putting funds aside for other capital expenditure projects.
The answer any sane man or woman would give is an emphatic " no ".
Such expenditure , which to the casual observer seems a colossal risk and a complete waste of money , is both utterly irresponsible and unacceptable , no matter honourable the motives and intentions appeared to be at the outset. Litigation is the road to financial ruin : the folly of fools.
Serving on a committee carries with it a significant legal responsibility. Common sense can take one very far in conducting club activities properly. Listening to advice from all quarters , especially from those who urge on the side of caution and prudence , can help protect one's position. Care , loyalty and fidelity in all committee actions represent the best form of financial protection for the club. The chairman must therefore strive be the guiding influence and voice of common sense and reason.
On breach of that duty I accuse.......I accuse
The use of club funds for a costly and unnecessary legal defence does , in my view , warrants severe condemnation. Any club chairman who sets out to persuade the membership to back such a foolish course of action , rather than seek other far less costly options on offer , should now hang his/her head in shame.
If members knew or realised that outcomes of trials are unpredictable , and that money spent in mounting a vigorous and robust legal defence is never likely to be recovered , then such a course of action is pure insanity. What gambler would bet on an outcome where even if he backs a winner he wins nothing and loses his stake money.
Moreover , if the chairman had been asked to pay these exorbitant legal costs from his/her own pocket , then I'm more than certain another course of action would have been chosen , such as a quick resolution through mediation , or an offer to the plaintiff to drop the action in return for getting a proportion of the damages sought after.
Why the chairman and committee failed to undertake a cost benefit analysis of a long drawn out legal defense beggars belief. If one considers the opportunity costs involved in a club wasting over £130,000 in lawyers' fees , then one would surely end up being racked with guilt , shame and deep embarrassment : a new club house , new facilities , funds for marketing ( and promoting the game to encourage new members ) , sound a much more sensible use of such money. The secured long-term future of the club is, and always will be , of paramount importance.
Sometimes one has to choose the lesser of two evils : pay out a few thousand to a plaintiff who perhaps doesn't deserve a penny , or pay out tens of thousands to lawyers.... who then advise you to accept a hands-down offer to walk away from the dispute , indicating that the judge is far more likely to make each side pay their costs.
I once heard of a club spending an obscene amount of money on private investigators in an attempt to unearth and track down the author of a series of poison pen letters , when the sensible option was to simply ignore them. So why in God's name spend a six-figure sum on fighting a wrongful expulsion law suit , when a simple reinstatement or begrudging pay off was all that was required. When inmates have taken over the asylum , someone has to step up to the mark and allow common sense to prevail over raw emotions if fuelled by crass stubbornness , prejudice and pride.
Moral : if you are going to be wrong , do it after careful consideration.
Committee members should always be conscious of the conflict between their personal interests and those of the club. Moreover, they should continuously examine the proposed actions like embarking upon , and continuing with , a dogged and determined legal defence. Is such an action really meeting the club's core objectives ? These of course include (i) staying financially viable , (ii) investing funds for the future development of the game , (iii) up grading the club's facilities and (iv) putting funds aside for other capital expenditure projects.
The answer any sane man or woman would give is an emphatic " no ".
Such expenditure , which to the casual observer seems a colossal risk and a complete waste of money , is both utterly irresponsible and unacceptable , no matter honourable the motives and intentions appeared to be at the outset. Litigation is the road to financial ruin : the folly of fools.
Serving on a committee carries with it a significant legal responsibility. Common sense can take one very far in conducting club activities properly. Listening to advice from all quarters , especially from those who urge on the side of caution and prudence , can help protect one's position. Care , loyalty and fidelity in all committee actions represent the best form of financial protection for the club. The chairman must therefore strive be the guiding influence and voice of common sense and reason.
On breach of that duty I accuse.......I accuse
Monday, 3 October 2016
JUST LISTEN TO WHAT BERNARD YOMTOV SAYS ABOUT BRIDGE AND WHY SOME CONTROL IS NEEDED TO REIN IN AND OUTLAW COMPLEX AND CONVOLUTED BIDDING SYSTEMS
Since bridge is a partnership game and chess is not , greater efforts are needed to stop opponents gaining an unfair advantage by having
complex and convoluted bidding systems.
" If your opponent in a chess game does something very unusual you can, at least in principle, figure out how to counter it right there at the board. Advance preparation would be nice, but is not required.
In bridge, players faced with complex and unfamiliar systems cannot do that. Any counter requires agreement between the partners, and that can't be done at the table, by the very rules. Even pre-alerts and the like don't solve this, because of time constraints, incomplete understandings, etc.
Further, at bridge you will not know all the twists and turns the opponents' auction might take. In chess it is all right there in front of you, if you can just figure it out.
What I'm saying is that in chess there is no inherent obstacle to countering an unusual move. In bridge there are such obstacles. "
System cards loaded with obstacles , yet no licensing constraints ......it's a recipe for anarchy .
Since bridge is a partnership game and chess is not , greater efforts are needed to stop opponents gaining an unfair advantage by having
complex and convoluted bidding systems.
" If your opponent in a chess game does something very unusual you can, at least in principle, figure out how to counter it right there at the board. Advance preparation would be nice, but is not required.
In bridge, players faced with complex and unfamiliar systems cannot do that. Any counter requires agreement between the partners, and that can't be done at the table, by the very rules. Even pre-alerts and the like don't solve this, because of time constraints, incomplete understandings, etc.
Further, at bridge you will not know all the twists and turns the opponents' auction might take. In chess it is all right there in front of you, if you can just figure it out.
What I'm saying is that in chess there is no inherent obstacle to countering an unusual move. In bridge there are such obstacles. "
System cards loaded with obstacles , yet no licensing constraints ......it's a recipe for anarchy .
Sunday, 2 October 2016
IF BRIDGE IS A SPORT THEN HOW COME THE MEANS BY WHICH THE GAME IS PLAYED FAIL TO CONFORM TO ANY REGULATORY STANDARDS ?........( Article by Carp )
In chess both players start out with the same pieces , which conform to particular rules of movement and placement. In cricket both the ball and the ball must confirm to material , size and weight requirements, and with rules on handling and usage. In golf , players'clubs must confirm to rules regarding the number carried , head types and shapes plus length and weight specifications. Athletes must strictly adhere to rules governing shoes, intake of medicines and dietary supplements.
Why have such rules one might ask ? The answer of course is to insure that all participants enter the competition on a level playing field , to deny any competitor to seek out and exploit AN UNFAIR ADVANTAGE.
So back to bridge and the means by which the game is played : the system card declaring what bids mean and what defensive manoeuvres will be used . If every competitor was obliged to conform to a standard bidding system, the playing field automatically becomes level. Success will now depend upon how well the players master and apply that system if they are to triumph over their opponents. By allowing extreme diversity of bidding systems as exists today the game has become a mockery, with some players armed with rocket launchers up against others who choose only to start out with pea shooters. The rocket launchers are designed to benefit the users to the detriment of those who have little or no time to grasp and understand their complex and convoluted sequences . made up of artificial , multiple possibility bids. This is equivalent to having a golfer carrying around 40 odds clubs . one ideally suited for every contingency , or a batsman electing to go in with a 12 inch wide bat,
Governing bodies have , in my view , lost control of the emerging farce, allowing so-called experts to use their overly complex custom made systems , designed primarily to achieve two goals : (i) to feed their vanity in naming the system after themselves - a way of achieving immortality (ii) to dope their opponents through sheer mental exhaustion leaving them permanently confused , dazed and befuddled - a seemingly legitimate way of cheating.
Bridge can only retain its integrity and majesty once competitors start out FROM THE SAME STARTING LINE .....WITH A CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH......HONEST INTENTIONS.... AND OF COURSE STANDARD CONFORMING EQUIPMENT.
No wonder the game is in the doldrums.
In chess both players start out with the same pieces , which conform to particular rules of movement and placement. In cricket both the ball and the ball must confirm to material , size and weight requirements, and with rules on handling and usage. In golf , players'clubs must confirm to rules regarding the number carried , head types and shapes plus length and weight specifications. Athletes must strictly adhere to rules governing shoes, intake of medicines and dietary supplements.
Why have such rules one might ask ? The answer of course is to insure that all participants enter the competition on a level playing field , to deny any competitor to seek out and exploit AN UNFAIR ADVANTAGE.
So back to bridge and the means by which the game is played : the system card declaring what bids mean and what defensive manoeuvres will be used . If every competitor was obliged to conform to a standard bidding system, the playing field automatically becomes level. Success will now depend upon how well the players master and apply that system if they are to triumph over their opponents. By allowing extreme diversity of bidding systems as exists today the game has become a mockery, with some players armed with rocket launchers up against others who choose only to start out with pea shooters. The rocket launchers are designed to benefit the users to the detriment of those who have little or no time to grasp and understand their complex and convoluted sequences . made up of artificial , multiple possibility bids. This is equivalent to having a golfer carrying around 40 odds clubs . one ideally suited for every contingency , or a batsman electing to go in with a 12 inch wide bat,
Governing bodies have , in my view , lost control of the emerging farce, allowing so-called experts to use their overly complex custom made systems , designed primarily to achieve two goals : (i) to feed their vanity in naming the system after themselves - a way of achieving immortality (ii) to dope their opponents through sheer mental exhaustion leaving them permanently confused , dazed and befuddled - a seemingly legitimate way of cheating.
Bridge can only retain its integrity and majesty once competitors start out FROM THE SAME STARTING LINE .....WITH A CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH......HONEST INTENTIONS.... AND OF COURSE STANDARD CONFORMING EQUIPMENT.
No wonder the game is in the doldrums.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



